Still, as Chief Deputy Attorney General Michael Kovac wrote in a brief, “Defendant’s statements are not protected by the First Amendment nor are they protected by Defendant’s ignorant understanding of the concept of tyranny. In any event, there doesn’t seem to be any evidence that Feeder’s calls have prompted anything. But I’m not sure it’s too far off from material President Donald J. Other incendiary remarks posted on Facebook by Feeder and cited by state prosecutors include more than three dozen instances of leaving a comment telling people to “arm themselves, form a militia, and go to war with the government,” a photo of Sisolak superimposed as a Nazi, and a GIF moving image of a gun pointed at a man’s head with the caption “I thought I saw John Wilkes Booth in the house.”
If not say hello to your new TYRANT leader.” “If you enjoy getting in the SPHINCTER each morning continue to write here and get no results. “In any WAR which we are now in sheep will be casualties but we must March on,” he wrote in one comment on a May 19 post regarding the number of COVID-19 tests in the state. Several of his comments made unspecified violent calls to action against the state’s Democratic governor. However, it strikes me that this one has a serious constitutional deficiency, which I haven’t seen raised in the court filings I see online and which I will explain below.īut first, what did Feeder write? The online Nevada Independent, which first broke news of the case, wrote this summary: Any century-old law–this one was enacted in 1911, and not one word has been changed since–is susceptible to challenge, especially one that criminalizes speech. But for me, the biggest problem with Ford’s bid to shut up criticism of Sisolak is the very law itself. Feeder did anything other than post his incendiary bluster on social media.” I fully agree. The Review-Journal editorial declared, “There’s no evidence that Mr. This raises obvious First Amendment freedom of speech issues.
Rudy gay jersey sales numbers trial#
But she ordered a trial next spring on the third charge, publishing matter inciting breach of peace or other crimes. A Las Vegas judge, Karen Bennett-Haron, threw out two of the charges–interfering with a public official and provoking commission of a breach of the peace. State prosecutors filed three criminal misdemeanor charges against Steve Feeder, a 60-year-old Las Vegas resident, for his strong rant, mainly on Sisolak’s official Facebook page, against Sisolak and his early handling of the coronavirus pandemic in closing certain kinds of businesses. But I find myself in agreement with its recent criticism of efforts by Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford to shut down a vociferous critic of his fellow Democrat, Governor Steve Sisolak. With its constant, often mindless criticism of all regulation and taxes–in a state with crushing unmet social needs–the Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial page is often a hard read for me.